Skip to main content

Eradicating poverty for sustainable development in post - 2015


Sustainable and equitable development in the post - 2015 period requires urgent action to eradicate poverty through global partnerships and investments. Global efforts to address poverty led by the United Nations through the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), from 2000-2015, fell short of their targets in many poor regions. This is partly due to the failure to simultaneously address economic and environmental problems in poor regions across the world. The key to equitable and sustainable development in economically poor regions is to improve the well-being of poor in addition to the livelihood. This can be achieved by integrating poverty alleviation with livelihood generating activities as published in the article - Linking ecosystem services with the constituents of human well-being for poverty alleviation in eastern Himalayas. Ecological Economics 107: 65-75 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091400250X# ).

 



 

This work is dedicated to the people of eastern Himalayan region who deal with very complicated social-economic and ecological issues to survive in challenging conditions. It explored interlinkages between livelihoods and ecosystem services in the region. It provides evidence to formulate strategy at macro and micro level and offers solutions to improve the well-being of rural communities. It provides investment strategy to collectively address poverty and concludes by strongly recommending that eradicating poverty is critical to achieve sustainable and equitable development in the post – 2015 period.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Campaign for the Support of Farmers in India

INDIAN GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO LISTEN TO FARMERS IN REFORMING AGRICULTURE IN INDIA   1. Three new  farm acts  in India are proving to be the last straw for about 90 million small-holders and their families. This has grave implications for about 800 million rural dwellers who are directly or indirectly dependent on farming for their livelihood. In addition, food security of the entire nation with 1.35 billion population is at risk. 2. Indian government maintains that these farm laws will usher a new economic revolution in the ailing farm sector. 3. Whereas farmers are opposing as they fear losing their land – only source of their livelihood – to corporate backed agri-enterprises. 4. The protest and persistence by farmers have opened up an opportunity for a dialogue between farmers and the government and for a new beginning. This has potential to reform small-holder agriculture but in close consultation with the farmers. 5. However, the rights of these farmers and many associated organisatio

Local Food Systems for Sustainability

Local, traditional, and indigenous food systems were successful in supplying year-round requirements for food and within the environmental constraints.  How were they able to do it? What were the practices and principles of local food systems that helped them thrive and maintain growing population in many parts of the world?  These food systems have been embedded in the society. Many traditional societies evolved around such unique food systems. Such food systems have been maintaining agricultural biodiversity and are important source of knowledge and culture as documented by the  Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems  (GIAHS) of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation. For example,  rice-fish-duck system in China,   traditional agriculture of Koraput, India ,  Noto’s Satoyama and Satoumi in Japan ,  Andean agriculture, Peru ,  Maasai Pastoralist Heritage Area in Tanzania , etc. These have been well documented around the world as source of inspir

All Good Earth and No Seed: Dilemma of an Organic Cotton Farmer

Sitaram, an organic cotton farmer struggles to develop non-GM cotton seed for his future generations. (Photo H. Sandhu) On my recent visits to rural parts of India, I came across a group of organic farmers in Kasrawad town, Khargone District, Madhya Pradesh. These farmers switched from high input cotton growing to organic cotton about 15 years ago. I talked to some farmers and they claimed that the smiles on their faces are all due to organic way of producing cotton. They are free from debts owing to input costs of pesticides, GM (genetically modified) seed and fertilisers. Instead they are boasting of fixed deposits in their banks as compared to fellow conventional farmers who are still sticking to GM cotton and hoping for some relief and expecting end to the vicious cycle of debt and crop failure due to periodic droughts in the area. Having said that these organic farmers are not rich or living a luxurious life however, they are living a decent life, largely free fro